Prenatal Diagnosis of Atretic Parietal Cephalocele
Introduction: Cephalocele is the herniation of intracranial structures such as arachnoid, glial and central nervous system rests through a fetal skull defect. Although the estimated incidence of cephaloceles is 0.8-4 per 10.000 live births, this number may be underestimated due to stillbirths and elective pregnancy terminations.
Case Presentation: We present the case of a 34-year-old primigravida with an uneventful medical and family history, who attended our unit for the second trimester fetal ultrasound examination. The ultrasound scan showed a singleton live fetus with a gestational age of 23 weeks and normal growth parameters for the gestational age of the pregnancy. The sonographic evaluation of the fetal head revealed a posterior protruding sac-like structure, which appeared to originate from the right lambdoid suture. The mass measured 22.6 x 27 x 16 mm and did not appear to include brain tissue. MRI revealed the apparent elevation of the straight venous sinus, a pathognomonic feature of congenital atretic parietal cephaloceles.
Conclusion: Careful evaluation of the fetal head during the second trimester ultrasound is essential for the timely and accurate diagnosis of atretic cephaloceles. MRI is helpful to differentiate sculp lesions such as sinus pericranii, lipomas, teratomas, sarcomas and cephaloceles. Early prenatal detection of cephaloceles allows more time for delivery planning and parental counselling.
F. Gary Cunningham, Kenneth J. Leveno, Steven L. Bloom, Jodi S. Dashe, Barbara L. Hoffman, Brian M. Casey, et al. Williams Obstetrics [Internet]. 25e ed. McGraw-Hill Medical; [cited 2020 Oct 26]. Available from: https://accessmedicine.mhmedical.com/book.aspx?bookID=1918
Yokota A, Kajiwara H, Kohchi M, Fuwa I, Wada H. Parietal cephalocele: Clinical importance of its atretic form and associated malformations. J Neurosurg [Internet]. 1988 [cited 2020 Oct 26];69(4):545–51. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3418387/
Lo BWY, Kulkarni A V., Rutka JT, Jea A, Drake JM, Lamberti-Pasculli M, et al. Clinical predictors of developmental outcome in patients with cephaloceles: Clinical article. J Neurosurg Pediatr [Internet]. 2008 Oct [cited 2020 Oct 26];2(4):254–7. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18831658/
Baradaran N, Nejat F, Baradaran N, El Khashab M. Cephalocele: Report of 55 cases over 8 years. Pediatr Neurosurg [Internet]. 2010 Mar [cited 2020 Oct 26];45(6):461–6. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20110760/
Martinez-Lage JF, Sola J, Casas C, Poza M, Almagro MJ, Girona DG. Atretic cephalocele: The tip of the iceberg. J Neurosurg [Internet]. 1992 [cited 2020 Sep 6];77(2):230–5. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1625010/
Morioka T, Hashiguchi K, Samura K, Yoshida F, Miyagi Y, Yoshiura T, et al. Detailed anatomy of intracranial venous anomalies associated with atretic parietal cephaloceles revealed by high-resolution 3D-CISS and high-field T2-weighted reversed MR images. Child’s Nerv Syst [Internet]. 2009 Mar [cited 2020 Oct 26];25(3):309–15. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18839185/
Patterson RJ, Egelhoff JC, Crone KR, Ball WS. Atretic parietal cephaloceles revisited: an enlarging clinical and imaging spectrum? Am J Neuroradiol. 1998;19(4).
Azusawa H, Ozaki Y, Shindoh N, Sumi Y. Usefulness of MR venography in diagnosing sinus pericranii: case report. Radiat Med. 2000;18(4):249–52.
Budorick NE, Pretorius DH, McGahan JP, Grafe MR, James HE, Slivka J. Cephalocele detection in utero: sonographic and clinical features. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol [Internet]. 1995 [cited 2020 Oct 26];5(2):77–85. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7719871/
Heidi Lewis, Gerald F. Tuite, Ignacio Gonzalez-Gomez, Felice Baron, Richard B Towbin, Alexander J Towbin, et al. Atretic cephalocele: Prenatal and postnatal imaging features. Appl Radiol 2017;46(8)36-39 [Internet]. [cited 2020 Oct 26]; Available from: https://appliedradiology.com/articles/atretic-cephalocele-prenatal-and-postnatal-imaging-features.